Specification of Linear Trend Test non-centrality parameter

In this link, we present the formula for the non-centrality parameter for The Linear Trend Test (Cochran 1954; Armitage 1955). Chapman and Nam’s work provides the theoretical basis for this formula (Chapman and Nam 1968). We use this non-centrality parameter in our webtool, PAWE-3D (http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/pawe3d/). The authors most gratefully acknowledge Wang Kook (Stony Brook University) who provided the mathematical derivation of the non-centrality parameter.

 

Definition of Linear Trend Test Statistic

Consider the parameters as presented in table 1, where the values represent the weight given to an observation in the ith category, and the values (respectively,) represent the observed number of genotypes in ith category for cases (respectively, controls). For example, when considering SNPs with alleles A and B, then could represent the number of cases with genotype AA, could represent the number of cases with genotype AB, and could represent the number of cases with genotype BB. Observe that, in table 1, we have , , , N = R +S. We comment that some commonly used weight settings  are: (0,1,2) (additive genetic model), (0,0,1) or (1,0,0) (recessive genetic model), and (1,1,0) or (0,1,1)  (dominant genetic model).        

    

 

Table 1. Tabular representation of parameters for Linear Trend Test

 

 

…

 

Case

…

R

Control

…

S

Total

…

N

 

 

Let

   

    ,

where fixed  and .

 

We have

    =

= .

 

The test statistic approximately follows a standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis that genotype frequencies for each category i are equal in cases and controls. From elementary mathematical statistics theory,  follows a distribution under the null hypothesis.  We refer to as The Linear Trend Test Statistic.

 

Non-centrality parameter for Linear Trend Test

 

In what follows, we restrict our attention to the situation where the number of categories I  in table 1 is equal to 3, as would be the case for a di-allelic locus such as a SNP. Based on previous work (Chapman and Nam 1968), it can be shown that the non-centrality parameter for The Linear Trend Test is given by:

 

,

 

where, , and R, S, and N are defined as in table 1. This non-centrality parameter enables us to compute asymptotic power for any significance level, given values of the weights xi, sample sizes R, S, and genotype frequencies in cases () and controls (). Equivalently, minimal sample size for a fixed power can be determined by solving for R, and specifying the ratio S/R of controls to cases [see (Gordon et al., 2002) for an example with the genotypic test of association on 2 degrees of freedom]. 

 

References

1.         Cochran, W.G. (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics. 10, 417-451.

2.         Armitage, P. (1955) Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics. 11, 375-386.

3.         Chapman, D.G. and Nam, J.M. (1968) Asymptotic power of chi square tests for linear trends in proportions. Biometrics. 24, 315-327.

4.         Gordon, D., Finch, S.J., Nothnagel, M. and Ott, J. (2002) Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered. 54, 22-33.